
Ban
on Recreational Shootings of Ducks and Quails in Qld
August
10 2005 was a great day for Queensland’s native ducks
and quails as The Premier and Environment Minister jointly announced
that no reinstatement of the Duck and Quail Management Plan
would take place when the current Plan expires on September
1 2005.
This
decision effectively means the end to recreational duck and
quail shooting in Qld as this so-called “sport”
can only take place under the auspices of the Management Plan.
Both The Premier and the Environment Minister had indicated
the cruelty and environmental concerns raised by the vast majority
of the general public who had written, phoned or visited their
MPs or Ms Boyle directly had been taken into consideration.
They also took the advise of the Animal Welfare Advisory Committee
which recommended banning recreational duck and quail shooting
due to the cruelty aspects.
This
decision is logical and reflects public thinking and attitudes
against cruelty to animals in sport.
“Animal
Liberation Qld is delighted with this ban “said Annette
Guice, ALQ President and Duck and Quail Campaign Director. “We
will however continue to lobby for a permanent legislated ban
so no future government can re-make the Management Plan.”
Animal
Liberation Qld would like to thank all our members and supporters,
other organizations and the public who supported our campaign
to ban recreational shooting of ducks and quails in Queensland.
Queensland has now joined WA, NSW and the ACT in banning recreational
duck and quail shooting.
Below
is the information for the campaign that helped in our success
with a ban on recreational shooting of ducks and quails.
"Pacific
Black Ducks, who mate for life are blasted out of the sky, just
for the hell of it"
What
can you do?
Who to write to?
What to write?
Each year in Qld during the hunting season thousands of ducks
and quails are killed or injured for recreation - "for
the hell of it". Hunting causes pain, suffering, fear,
stress, injury and death to legalised game birds, non-target
birds and other species e.g. swans. There is NO scientific evidence
that these birds damage the environment, crops or need culling
(Australia's eastern seaboard has been in the grip of drought
for the last 8 years - bird populations are suffering anyway).
It is extremely difficult to understand how the practice of
disturbing and flushing out flocks of duck and quail for the
sole purpose of killing them can be considered 'sporting'. These
beautiful and gentle birds live in their own natural habitat
for nine to ten months of the year undisturbed, most with their
lifelong mates.
Species
shot in Queensland
In Queensland, there are six species of duck, and two species
of quail that can legally be killed each year in the name of
‘sport’.
The
duck species are:
• Plumed whistling duck
• Wandering whistling duck
• Maned duck
• Grey teal
• Hardhead
• Pacific black duck
The
quail species are:
• Stubble quail
• Brown quail
| Question |
| How
easy is it to get permission to shoot? |
| Answer |
VERY
EASY
To participate in recreational duck killing, each person
must obtain a duck hunting identification kit from the Environmental
Protection Agency. It is claimed that this kit will assist
the shooter to pass a ‘duck identification test’
prior to the issue of a recreational wildlife harvesting
licence. |
| |
| Question |
| Is
this sufficient training to allow an amateur to correctly
identify a bird in the air many meters away? |
| Answer |
NO
Even experienced bird watchers cannot always clearly identify
between ‘game’ and ‘non-game’ species.
And as birds cannot be shot at rest – this makes it
even more difficult to discern. |
Slaughter
in the Air - Facts and figures
2002
- Registered shooters: 402
- Birds killed (bagged)
- 11,061 ducks
- 1,225 quails
2003
- Season cancelled
2004
- Registered shooters:
379
- Birds killed (bagged)
- 11,562 ducks
- 2,839 quails
The Regulations
When a season is declared certain regulations apply that affect
the:
• times when ducks and quails can be shot
• number of birds that can be shot every day
• species of birds that can be killed
• manner in which birds can be killed e.g. they cannot
be shot at rest
| Question |
| In
a state as large as Queensland, how can a handful of rangers
adequately ensure that these regulations are being met by
shooters? |
| Answer |
| THEY
CAN’T |
| |
| Question |
| Couldn’t
the Environmental Protection Agency’s meagre resources
be put to better use? |
| Answer |
| DEFINITELY |
Studies into ‘clean’ kill
A mathematical analysis carried out by Dr G. Russell showed
that shooters with a shots per bagged bird ratio of between
4 and 10, will wound approximately 50-150 birds for every 100
birds bagged.
This
was also highlighted in a particularly gruesome laboratory experiment
conducted by Winchester, (a company that manufactures both arms
and ammunition) which indicates the percentage of ducks injured.
The researchers tied live ducks to sleds, which moved along
at constant speed. A shotgun was fixed to a stand and set up
to fire automatically as a sled attached to a live duck moved
past. Shooting was therefore conducted under 'ideal conditions'
as the gun was completely steady, perfectly aimed and the sled
with the ducks moved across the line of fire at a constant speed.
Findings reveal:
• When the ducks were 30 metres from the gun, the wounding
rate was low
• However at 40 metres, 8% of the birds were not injured
badly enough to be classed as 'bagged' (eg they were injured
but probably would have got away from the shooter)
• By 50 metres, 50 birds were injured but not 'bagged'
for every 100 birds 'bagged'.
So between 40 and 50 metres the injury rate increases sharply
with shooters less likely to be able to retrieve ('bag') the
injured ducks.
Taking
into account this information and understanding that shooters
would not possibly be within the 'perfect range' for a definite
kill, shows how many ducks are really left injured or left to
suffer a slow agonising death.
Partnerships
with the environment
Despite the rhetoric of shooters groups and the Department of
Environment who state they are in a 'conservation partnership'
to assist the wetlands, there is absolutely no scientific or
environmental reason to allow recreational duck and quail shooting.
And certainly is no humanitarian reason. Any rehabilitation
work done in wetlands should be done for the sake of the animals,
the environment, and for generations of Australians to enjoy.
The wetlands should not be kept stocked with water birds and
in good condition so the department can service its clients
– the shooters. The question needs to be asked: how much
of this wetland work would continue if duck and quail shooting
was banned in Queensland? Possibly not much, and it is this
attitude towards our wetlands and water birds that is very disturbing.
Lead
shot poisons both birds and the environment
Sadly, the deaths do not stop at the end of the shooting season.
The weapon commonly used by a shooter is a shotgun using lead
pellets. With hundreds of shooters carrying out this
‘sport’ an enormous amount of used lead shot falls
directly into the water and lodges into the top few centimetres
of mud. Birds of course do not have any teeth, and when they
forage in the mud for food they look for hard bits of grit that
will grind up food in their muscular gizzard (stomach). Birds
that feed off the bottom of the wetlands pick up and swallow
the lead pellets as grit. Once in the gizzard, the pellet is
broken down and the lead is absorbed into the bloodstream. This
causes chronic lead poisoning, resulting in
a slow, agonising death over a three-week period.
Lead
shot was banned in
• SA in 1994,
• Victoria in 1999, and
• for recreational duck hunting ONLY was banned in Queensland
from November 2003.
However,
lead shot is still allowed for recreational
quail shooting, and for duck shooting on farm damage mitigation
permits.
| Question |
| Is
duck and quail shooting banned anywhere in Australia? |
| Answer |
YES
Duck shooting has never been allowed in the ACT
WA totally banned duck shooting in 1990
NSW banned recreational duck shooting in 1995
In Victoria and SA the number of hunters has been greatly
reduced due to public awareness of the barbarity of duck
shooting. |
| |
When
the WA Government banned recreational duck shooting in 1990,
the then Premier, Dr Carmen Lawrence, in a media release stated:
"Our community has reached a stage of enlightenment
where it can no longer accept the institutionalised killing
of native birds for recreation."
Animal
Liberation (Qld) involvement
ALQ continues to lobby all 89 state MPs on this issue to gain
sufficient support to affect a ban. We have initiated two e-petitions
resulting in over 1,500 signatures. We also continue to gather
signatures on our duck postcards for distribution to the relevant
individual state MPs. We have called upon our members to directly
contact their own state MP either through a personal visit or
letter, and to also write to the Minister for the Environment,
Ms Desley Boyle.
In 2004, ALQ became part of a coalition of animal
rights/welfare and environmental groups working together to
see that a total ban on the recreational shooting of ducks and
quails happens. The other groups in this alliance are Birds
Qld, RSPCA, Wildlife Preservation Society and the Queensland
Conservation Council. This coalition has held several protests
to show the community’s disgust for this slaughter.
What you can do
• Write a polite letter to the Minister for Environment
Ms Desley Boyle demanding a permanent ban on the recreational
shooting of ducks and quails in Queensland.
•
Write (or make a visit) to your state MP and ask him/her to
vote for a permanent end to this barbaric practice. Call us
and we’ll give you a helpful Fact Sheet that will help
you with your personal visit.
Who
to write to or personally visit
• Please write or personally visit your State MP. Contact
Queensland
State MPs
•
Please write to the Environment Minister.
Hon. Ms Desley Boyle
Minister for the Environment, Local Government, Planning and
Women
PO Box 15031
City East Qld 4002.
Fax: 07 3221 9964
Email: elgpw@ministerial.qld.gov.au
Some
facts you can include in your letter:
• Cruelty is inherent in the recreational shooting of
ducks and quails, and cannot be removed unless the sport is
banned.
• Many birds are left to die in agony from their injuries,
or will be permanently impaired due to shotgun wounds.
• The killing of birds for ‘sport’ or ‘tradition’
may have been considered acceptable in the past but it is now
considered totally unacceptable by the vast majority of the
community.
• Even experienced bird watchers have great difficulty
in distinguishing ‘game’ from ‘non-game’
birds when they are in the air many metres away or flushed from
cover. It is therefore impossible for shooters to correctly
identify these birds.
• Numerous ‘non-game’ birds are also killed
and injured during shooting seasons.
• The meagre resources of the Environment Protection Agency
should be used for the benefit of wildlife, not so fewer than
400 people can kill birds for ‘fun’.
• Duck hunting has never been allowed in the ACT, and
was banned in WA (1990) and NSW (1995). In Victoria and SA the
number of hunters has been greatly reduced due to public awareness
of the barbarity of this practice.
• Water bird population has been continually falling since
the mid 1980s.
• Habitat destruction is also causing numbers to fall
and hunting only adds to this dilemma.
• Hunting ducks and quails with little care for their
welfare directly conflicts with the Animal Care and Protection
Act 2001.
|